Per-Person Liability for Auto-Insurance

Insurance companies can limit liability in automobile insurance policies by setting a per person limitation on the amount of benefits that will be paid under the policy for bodily injury to or the death of one person per accident. Whether the limitation is stated as person or each person makes no difference. Such limitations on liability are necessary. Without them, an insurance company could be at risk for more than the funds that it has to pay its claims. The insured pays a certain amount, called a premium, based in part upon the policy limits.

Arbitration for Motor Vehicle Insurance Disputes

Arbitration (which is sometimes referred to as a type of Alternative Dispute Resolution, or ADR) is a procedure in which the parties to a dispute, for example, parties who disagree about some aspect of a motor vehicle insurance policy, voluntarily submit the issues they are unable to agree upon to the judgment of one or more disinterested persons, called arbitrators, and agree to abide by the judgment of the arbitrators, which is called an award. One significant thing to note about arbitration is that it takes place outside the court system and so can be conducted less formally and with less expense than a traditional judicial proceeding.

Setoffs and Uninsured Motorist Insurance Policies

Some state statutes allow uninsured motorist insurance companies to setoff amounts that an insured received from workers compensation, Social Security, and settlements with a liability insurance company. Therefore, if an insured were injured in a car accident while driving in the course of his or her employment, the insurance company could offset the uninsured motorist benefits in the full amount of the insured's workers compensation judgment.

Crashworthiness Issues in Automotive Products Liability Cases

In order to succeed in a products liability action against the manufacturer or seller of a motor vehicle, a plaintiff has to show that the vehicle as sold contained a defect that created an unreasonable risk of death, personal injury, or property damage when used for its intended purpose and that the defect caused an accident or similar occurrence, such as a vehicle fire, that resulted in the loss for which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages. Automotive products liability cases may involve allegations that a car or truck was defective in some aspect of the way in which it was designed, in the manner in which its parts were manufactured and assembled into a complete vehicle, or due to a failure to warn the purchaser or user of the vehicle of some danger inherent in its use and operation. Cases involving the doctrine of crashworthiness (which is sometimes referred to as enhanced injury or second collision) constitute a subset of those cases in which it is alleged that a design defect in a vehicle was the cause of the injuries complained of.

Attorneys Retained by Auto Insurers: Duty to the Insured

When a lawsuit is filed against an automobile insurance company's insured for damages allegedly suffered by a claimant in an automobile accident with the insured, the insurance company has a duty to defend the insured. A part of the insurance company's duty can be the right to retain an attorney for the insured's defense and to pay that attorney's fee. Because the insurance company selects and pays the defense counsel, questions arise regarding who is the attorney's client and whether the attorney owes a duty to only the insured or to both the insured and the insurance company.